Reported incidents of mortgage fraud in the U.S. increased by nearly 50% in the first quarter of 2008

Reported incidents of mortgage fraud in the U.S. increased by nearly 50% in the first quarter of 2008 from a year ago, according to a new report released this week. The report is based on data submitted by Mortgage Asset Research Institute (MARISM) subscribers about loans that were originated in the first quarter of this year and have since been classified as fraudulent, and shows a whopping 42% increase in filings. At the local level, Florida continues to lead all states in reported mortgage fraud. In fact, according to the report, Florida accounted for 24% of all properties with material misrepresentation for loans originated during the first quarter of 2008, and the Miami MSA alone boasts 49% of all of the reports submitted for properties in the state.California ranked second in the first quarter of this year (with 52% of the properties with misrepresentation coming from the Los Angeles area), followed by a three-way tie for third place among Illinois, Maryland and Michigan.Major urban areas also score the highest in Illinois, Maryland and Michigan. Ninety-four percent of investigations in the state of Illinois are for properties in the Chicago MSA, while in Maryland, 25% of reports are in the Baltimore MSA. In addition, the Detroit MSA counts for 56% of all of the misrepresentation reported for Michigan.For all states, the most common type of fraud was in the “General Application Misrepresentation” category, followed closely by misrepresentations related to income and employment. In addition, multiple types of fraud types–such as identity theft and identity fraud–continue to appear in a significant percentage of loan transactions.In general, misrepresentation on the mortgage application trends high in each of the states. Income and employment misrepresentation on the mortgage application rank high in Florida,
California, Illinois and Maryland. Florida and Maryland report higher income than employment misrepresentation, and California and Illinois report slightly higher employment than income misrepresentation. Michigan shows a high percentage of asset and debt misrepresentation on the mortgage application. Appraisal misrepresentation (including value inflation and incorrect use of comparables) is most prevalent in Michigan. Maryland has an abnormally high percentage — 69% — of tax return and financial statement misrepresentation. In its final analysis, this week’s report concludes the following:
The first quarter data reveals that loan application misrepresentation continues to plague the industry. According to the FBI’s 2007 Mortgage Fraud Report, “the downward trend in the housing market provides an ideal climate for mortgage fraud perpetrators to employ a myriad of schemes suitable to a down market.” Simply stated, mortgage fraud will not disappear — in fact, it is expected to significantly grow, evolve and penetrate new areas within the industry.
As the nation’s lenders redraw their credit practices, we see a continued need to highlight and eliminate loans that are not in good order at the point of origination, well before prefunding processors spend any effort to seek added verification or validation of the mortgage application information. If loan applications are not in good order when submitted, the loan data may likely be adjusted to fit the business practice expectation to meet the requirements for funding, which ultimately may result in funded loans that quickly go bad.
To save itself from schemes both commonplace and new, the mortgage industry must continue to strengthen its attention to and practice of due diligence to ensure that transactions are in good order at the point of origination. This includes an analysis of the borrower’s identity, as well as the players involved in each of the real estate roles whether they are outsourced or work directly for the lender.
As lenders pursue higher-quality loans for the market, the priority should be on identifying poor quality at the earliest possible point in the process — and at the lowest possible cost. In MARI’s view, the origination and prefunding processes offer the largest and least expensive opportunities to assure funding of higher quality loans. How a lender accepts or rejects a loan application at the front door is often all a criminal needs to see how much further he or she may push through the loan process.
Pre-funding fraud detection solutions can help prevent the risk of application discrepancies, exposure to compromised identities and establishment of relationships with insiders who leverage someone’s good name to perpetrate fraud. If on the mortgage application general misrepresentation or income, appraiser or employer misrepresentation were checked adequately at origination and pre-funding, in this quarter’s examples, would there still be significant fraud to report…?
Mortgage fraud inflicts damage to profits, reputations and consumer confidence. Today, it is wise to ensure you know the customers, employees and vendors involved in every loan transaction — doing this early in the process can result in overall protection from tainted pipelines and hidden threats to loan quality.